According to a recent survey, 55 percent of Board members at colleges and universities across the country think that the cost of college is too high. But when asked if their own college or university was too expensive, 62 percent said no (http://agb.org/reports/2012/2012-agb-survey-higher-education-governance). Let’s face reality: college is too expensive for most families, and Whittier is no exception. The challenge is how to preserve the quality of education at schools like Whittier at less cost to students. Whittier is attacking this challenge in multiple ways: (1) attracting more financial aid, scholarship, and fellowship support, often through gifts from generous alumni who tell us they could not have earned a Whittier education without the aid they received; (2) deriving more of the revenue needed to run the College from sources other than students’ tuition (e.g., running summer camps and educational programs, and renting conference space); (3) scouring administrative and academic budgets for ways to economize, and (4) continuing to urge that education is a public good, which should be supported by all of the citizens of this nation and state (please join me in asking Congress to extend tax incentives for charitable giving to colleges and universities). As I said at the beginning of this post, we do not want to sacrifice the quality of the education we offer to save on costs, but there are many other ways to achieve some relief for our students and we’re determined to succeed. Sticking our heads in the sand and saying “there is no problem at our school” is not a viable solution.
While traveling through airports recently, I kept seeing happy children about the age of those who were murdered in Newtown, perhaps on their way with family members to holiday celebrations. Children should be happy and, as President Obama said in his cogent speech last weekend, at the very least they should be safe.
To lend whatever weight we can to encourage a truly open, intelligent conversation on this important public policy issue, other college presidents and I have signed on to the letter below.
The letter was co-written by my colleagues Lawrence M. Schall, Oglethorpe University and Elizabeth Kiss, Agnes Scott College and (at the time of this writing) has been signed by 170 college and university presidents across the nation:
“On the same day our nation learned in horror that 20 first graders and six educators were gunned down at Sandy Hook Elementary School, young people around the country were learning if they had been accepted to their favored colleges and universities. For many years now, our nation’s leaders have engaged in fevered debates on higher education, yet lawmakers shy away from taking action on one issue that prevents thousands of young people from living lives of promise, let alone realizing their college dreams. That issue is gun safety.
Among the world’s 23 wealthiest countries, 80% of all gun deaths occur in the United States and 87% of all children killed with guns are killed here (Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery). In 2010, 2,694 young people were killed by gunfire. 1,773 were victims of homicide; 67 were elementary school-age children. If those children and teens were alive today, they would fill 108 classrooms of 25 each.
We are college and university presidents. We are parents. We are Republicans, Democrats and Independents. We urge both our President and Congress to take action on gun control now. As a group, we do not oppose gun ownership. But, in many of our states, legislation has been introduced or passed that would allow gun possession on college campuses. We oppose such laws. We fully understand that reasonable gun safety legislation will not prevent every future murder. Identification and treatment of the mental health issues that lie beneath so many of the mass murders to which we increasingly bear witness must also be addressed.
As educators and parents, we come together to ask our elected representatives to act collectively on behalf of our children by enacting rational gun safety measures, including
- Ensuring the safety of our communities by opposing legislation allowing guns on our campuses and in our classrooms
- Ending the gun show loophole, which allows for the purchase of guns from unlicensed sellers without a criminal background check
- Reinstating the ban on military-style semi-automatic assault weapons along with high-capacity ammunition magazines
- Requiring consumer safety standards for all guns, such as safety locks, access prevention laws, and regulations to identify, prevent and correct manufacturing defects
The time has long since passed for silence and inaction on the issue of reasonable and rational gun safety legislation. We hereby request that our nation’s policy leaders take thoughtful and urgent action to ensure that current and future generations may live and learn in a country free from the threat of gun violence.”
Click here to see a list of all presidents who have signed the letter: http://www.collegepresidentsforgunsafety.org
Below you can find photos of last Saturday’s holiday parade. We had over 100 athletes march through Uptown Whittier, proudly wearing their Poet gear and carrying signs advertising their sport. Of course, the biggest hit of the parade was John Poet himself, who was asked to pose with so many of the children along the parade route. And the Grand Marshall was Whittier College’s own Hubert Perry ’35. Thank you to all who represented Whittier so well in this annual event.
Thanks for all those who worked hard to make the 12/5 celebration so successful — over 1100 donors and over $100,000 raised for student scholarships. And although I hate to admit it, I actually had fun performing for the Poet style Gangnam video (Link: www.youtube.com/WhittierCollege). There must be limits to what I will do on camera for Whittier College, but I’m not quite sure now what those limits are.
The campus is quiet, and students are either in an exam or studying for one. But last night’s Midnight Breakfast was a ball, with faculty and staff serving starving (or so it seemed) students who were taking a break from studies. Enjoy the photos, and best wishes for a successful end of the semester.
Thank you to all who supported Whittier students and students around the state by voting for Proposition 30. Now is the time to have intelligent debate about the value of support for education, what makes up a quality education, and how we can deliver one to all. Let’s start.
John Greenleaf Whittier wrote surely one of the best poems about voting, which I reprint for you below.
The proudest now is but my peer,
The highest not more high;
To-day, of all the weary year,
A king of men am I.
To-day, alike are great and small,
The nameless and the known;
My palace is the people’s hall,
The ballot-box my throne!
Who serves to-day upon the list
Beside the served shall stand;
Alike the brown and wrinkled fist,
The gloved and dainty hand!
The rich is level with the poor,
The weak is strong to-day;
And sleekest broadcloth counts no more
Than homespun frock of gray.
To-day let pomp and vain pretence
My stubborn right abide;
I set a plain man’s common sense
Against the pedant’s pride.
To-day shall simple manhood try
The strength of gold and land;
The wide world has not wealth to buy
The power in my right hand!
Go vote! Go poets!
Yesterday’s presidential debate began with a question from a student who is worried about finding a job after graduation. In this economy he expressed a valid concern.
At Whittier College we are looking to one of our most important strengths – intense faculty and student interaction in small class settings – to address this same concern, and we have an excellent base to build upon. We know that the qualities employers want to see in candidates for jobs map nicely onto what our faculty want to instill in every graduate: writing and oral communication skills, ability to work well in groups to achieve complex tasks, a propensity to think through challenges from multiple points of view, and cultural competence evidenced by understanding and respect for people of all backgrounds.
Whittier has always focused on providing these educational outcomes. However, this summer, the faculty took this focus up a notch by spending time thinking through how the faculty might better integrate career development and tracking into the curriculum and into departmental activities. The faculty even made career preparation the subject of their August retreat, and brainstormed about what skills and experiences students should have by the end of their first year at the College and each successive year. While a group of faculty leaders continues with this “whole campus” discussion, our Dean will work with individual departments to enact changes to particular disciplines to benefit our students.
And with all of this activity as background, I look forward to next week, when over 250 people – most of them former students – will come back over Whittier Weekend to celebrate three professors who for a combined 125 years of teaching have exemplified our faculty’s devotion to students’ success after college. Professors Fred Bergerson, Mike McBride, and John Neu have provided generations of Whittier students with foundational academic excellence in the classroom, connections to professional networks leading to graduates’ first and subsequent jobs, and countless hours of inspirational advice, encouragement, and resumé reading on the side.
I wish all students could experience a Whittier education.
Yesterday, we marked another page in our Rock’s 100-year-old history with its relocation on campus to about 20 feet north of its original site. At 7a.m., the crew from Carty Construction began the excavation process, with the Lancers and the QC on hand to record progress. As expected, we discovered about many inches of paint on the Rock’s exposed surface—evidence of years of spirited student painting—and two additional feet of granite beneath the lawn. The crews laid a cement base to provide an anchoring foundation and restore a little bit of the Rock’s original height.
Years of corrosion, earthquakes, pranks, and exposure to the elements put quite a few significant cracks and fractures in our Rock, and in some cases it was literally “held together” by the paint (thank you, Society members and all others who have helped to preserve it all these years!). When we attempted to place the Rock on its new base, the Rock split in two. Fortunately, we planned for this possibility and disaster has been averted by a construction-grade epoxy. The Rock is whole again, and we now will fill any additional cracks, and essentially make the Rock sounder than ever, preserving it for another century of use and lore.
I am certain that yesterday’s chapter in Rock history will be shared and recalled by the Whittier community in 2112 as they mark the Rock’s 200th birthday. Be part of it; stop by the site take a photo to share with your grandchildren!
A little while ago the NYTimes ran an editorial by Ruth Whippman, a self-described “transplanted Brit” who talked about differences in the pursuit of happiness among the Brits and those in the US. She even claimed that California is the headquarters of the happy contingent. Being a student of “Thinking, Fast and Slow” and loath to stereotype myself, I immediately recoiled. But then I remembered back to 2005 when David and I first moved to California and people starting asking us about noticeable differences between Californians and our East Coast brethren. My usual retort was to dismiss the stereotyping at the heart of the question and say that people are people all over the world. But, in all honesty, I quickly developed two generalizations about Californians. First, Californians seem much more likely to pay attention to crossing signals. Living in New England for the previous 25 years and spending lots of time in New York, I was used to just crossing the street wherever and whenever I wanted to do so. I have no idea whether the difference here is due to good parental training, fear of tickets or crazy drivers, or just good common sense, but I decided I needed to change my ways, be a good role model, and cross properly too. The second difference I noticed was that Californians love their cars. No, I am not remarking on the traffic. You have never experienced real traffic if you have not tried to travel along the beltway around Washington, DC in rush hour or driven on the only freeway between Hartford and Boston when there is an accident halfway there. Instead, I am referring to the fact that Californians baby their cars by cleaning them all the time. When I first moved here, my assistant Irene Gallardo used to drop hints about keeping my car clean; occasionally she would even offer to take it to the car wash herself. Being a New Englander for 25 years, I never washed my car. Why bother when two days later it will rain or snow, and the car will just get muddy again. But I can tell that I am now a true Californian; just writing about this makes me want to get out there and clean!